Run Moto Run
ApriliaBenelliBimotaBMWBSADucatiFB MondialHusqvarnaKTMMoto GuzziMV AgustaNortonTriumph
Benelli · 1982–1983

1982 Benelli 254 Quattro

Share
1982 Benelli 254 Quattro
Photo: Mike Schinkel, CC BY 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons · CC BY
Auction record
Average sale
—
Sales
0
Low
—
High
—

No auction data yet — sign up to be notified when one goes to auction.

Specifications

Category
Sport
Displacement
231.0 ccm (14.10 cubic inches)
Displacement (cc)
231.00
Engine details
In-line four, four-stroke
Power
27.0 HP (19.7 kW) @ 10500 RPM
Top speed
150.0 km/h (93.2 mph)
Compression
10.5:1
Bore × stroke
44.0 x 38.0 mm (1.7 x 1.5 inches)
Valves/cyl
2.0
Fuel control
Overhead Cams (OHC)
Cooling
Air
Gearbox
5-speed
Transmission
Chain (final drive)
Front tyre
2.75-18
Rear tyre
3.00-18
Front brakes
Single disc
Rear brakes
Expanding brake
Wet weight
122.0 kg (269.0 pounds)
Fuel capacity
8.00 litres (2.11 US gallons)

The 1982 Benelli 254 Quattro

Benelli's 254 Quattro slots into 1982 as one of the more unusual entries in the small-capacity sport class, a four-cylinder engine squeezed into a quarter-liter package at a time when most rivals settled for twins or singles. That configuration is the whole story here: the little four spins to a high redline and rewards riders willing to work the gearbox and keep revs up rather than lug around on torque, which there isn't much of. It's a bike that feels busy and eager in a way a Honda CB250 twin doesn't, with a light 122kg chassis that makes the modest power feel livelier than the numbers suggest, though the small 8-liter tank means you're planning fuel stops on longer rides. The 1982 model carried over without significant mechanical changes from the prior year, so buyers comparing it to a 1981 example should focus on mileage, service history, and condition rather than spec differences. Today it draws attention from Benelli collectors and small-bore enthusiasts who want something mechanically distinctive rather than another Japanese four-stroke twin, and moderate collector interest reflects genuine scarcity more than mainstream demand. Parts and specialist knowledge remain the real ownership challenge.